backbta.blogg.se

The Sapphire Pulse RX 5600 XT we reviewed looks and feels significantly cheaper than the reference 57 XT GPUs we saw last year.

Of course, there's more than just a performance difference between the 5600 and AMD's more powerful cards. But after re-testing the RX 5700, its clear that its performance has dramatically improved with newer drivers.) (Note: At first, the 5600 also surprised us by outscoring the 5700's 3DMark results from our initial review. The Witcher 3, a notoriously demanding game, shows more of a difference between the 56, but even then the more expensive card is only around slightly faster in 1080p and 1,440p. In fact, both cards performed similarly in Hitman 2 and Destiny 2 with high graphics settings at 1080p and 1,440p. When measured in teraflops, that actually puts the RX 5600 (7.19 TFLOPS) closer the 5700 (7.95 TFLOPS) than it does the 5500 (5.2 TFLOPS). Surprisingly, that's 2GB less than the entry level RX 5500, but AMD says the 5600 also has around 30 percent more memory bandwidth, which makes up for the difference. It also sports 6GB of GDDR6 memory, 2GB less than the 5700. The Radeon RX 5600 XT's specs tell its entire story: it features 36 compute units and 2,304 stream processors - the same as the Radeon 5700, but with slower clock speeds between 1,375MHz and 1,560MHz. It's also powerful enough to bump graphics settings to maximum on most games as well, which is something a three-year-old video card like the GTX 1060 would struggle with.

It'll also handle more demanding titles, like Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Gears 5 at around 90 FPS, which is a noticeable difference if you've got a high refresh rate monitor. With the Radeon RX 5600 XT, AMD is specifically targeting players who demand speeds closer to 144 FPS at 1080p for competitive games like Apex Legends and Fortnite.